News On Japan

Can Japan Afford the Future? Key Economic Debates on Investment and Tax Reform

TOKYO - Economist Toshihiro Nagahama joined lawmaker Yuichiro Tamaki for an urgent discussion on Japan’s economic policies. The conversation took place against the backdrop of the Ishiba administration’s efforts to pass the 2025 fiscal budget by the end of March, with opposition parties playing a crucial role in shaping policy decisions.

One key proposal from the Democratic Party for the People (DPP) is to raise the so-called ‘103 million yen income wall’ to 1.78 million yen. Tamaki explained the reasoning behind this push, highlighting the need to create financial incentives for middle-income earners and alleviate labor shortages. However, securing the necessary financial resources remains a major concern. Nagahama also weighed in on the recent tax reform plan, which raises the threshold from 1.03 million to 1.23 million yen, arguing that this increase is inadequate and does little to address deeper structural economic issues.

The discussion extended to broader fiscal and economic policies, particularly regarding potential inflationary pressures under a possible second Trump administration in the United States. Japan’s ability to manage social security costs in such an environment was a major point of debate. Entrepreneur Takafumi Horie proposed a straightforward approach to increasing take-home pay for workers, suggesting that Japan needs a more aggressive strategy to boost wages and reduce financial burdens on the working population.

In the area of tax policy, Tamaki addressed the ongoing debate over the 2025 tax reforms. One major issue was the government’s decision to postpone gasoline tax reductions. While the ruling party leaders had agreed to raise the income threshold to 1.78 million yen and eliminate the temporary gasoline tax, the timeline for implementation remained unclear. Tamaki strongly advocated for abolishing the gasoline tax, arguing that it was initially introduced as a temporary measure 50 years ago and had since outlived its original purpose.

The conversation also touched on Japan’s broader approach to defense-related taxation. Initially, the government had planned to raise corporate, income, and tobacco taxes to fund increased defense spending. However, the ruling coalition later revised its stance, aiming to reduce income tax hikes while still increasing corporate and tobacco taxes. This move was expected to generate approximately one trillion yen in revenue. Tamaki pointed out that Japan’s tobacco tax remains significantly lower than international standards, suggesting that further hikes could be a viable revenue source.

A critical aspect of the discussion centered on Japan’s declining investment in science and technology. Over the past two decades, China has increased university research funding 24-fold, South Korea by nearly six times, and the United States by 2.7 times. In stark contrast, Japan has actually reduced its funding by 10%. As a result, Japan is the only major country where the number of Ph.D. holders is decreasing. Nagahama and Tamaki emphasized that without substantial investment in research and innovation, Japan’s future economic growth could be severely hampered. They argued that funding for scientific research should not be subject to the same fiscal constraints as social welfare spending, advocating for new government bonds specifically allocated for education and technological advancement.

Healthcare policy was another major topic, particularly concerning Japan’s medical system and workforce distribution. Nagahama pointed out that a growing number of the country’s brightest students are opting for careers in medicine over science and technology, primarily due to income stability. Horie suggested that medical institutions should adopt corporate management structures to improve efficiency and cost-effectiveness. He also highlighted the need for preventive healthcare policies, citing models from Germany and Denmark where regular dental check-ups are mandated to maintain insurance coverage. Implementing similar measures in Japan, he argued, could help reduce long-term healthcare costs by encouraging early medical intervention.

As Japan enters a crucial year with significant elections and policy debates on the horizon, Tamaki stressed the importance of decisive political action. He underscored the need for bold reforms in taxation, economic policy, and social spending to ensure the country’s long-term stability and prosperity. The discussion ended with a call for continued debate and policy innovation to navigate the complex challenges facing Japan’s economy.

Source: 堀江貴文 ホリエモン

News On Japan
POPULAR NEWS

Japan’s World Cup campaign ended in the cruelest possible fashion on June 29, as Gabriel Martinelli scored in the fifth minute of stoppage time to give Brazil a 2-1 victory over the Samurai Blue in their knockout match in Houston. Japan had led in the first half and were still level at 1-1 in the final moments, but Martinelli’s late strike sent Brazil into the Round of 16 and eliminated Japan from the tournament.

Strong earthquakes have continued to shake parts of Japan in recent weeks, with 11 temblors measuring lower 5 or above on the Japanese seismic intensity scale recorded across the country since April 2026.

A Kintetsu Railway train derailed inside Kyoto Station on the morning of June 29, forcing partial suspensions on the Kintetsu Kyoto Line for the rest of the day and causing long delays that hit commuters, students and tourists.

A section of stone wall at Hikone Castle, one of Japan’s few surviving original Edo-period castles and a National Treasure whose main keep remains intact more than 400 years after its construction, collapsed after heavy rain caused by Typhoons No. 7 and No. 8, Hikone city officials said.

Japan advanced to the knockout stage of the World Cup after a 1-1 draw with Sweden on June 25, finishing second in Group F and setting up a Round of 32 clash with Brazil in Houston.

MEDIA CHANNELS
         

MORE Politics NEWS

Japan’s political agenda on June 29 centered on Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s attempt to connect economic growth, national security and technological resilience, as the government moved toward a long-term economic blueprint while also responding to China’s expanded export controls and preparing a revision of Japan’s Arctic policy.

Japan remains among the world’s leading nations in seabed resource development and should accelerate work to sharpen its technology, Democratic Party for the People upper house lawmaker Yoshihiko Yamada said, calling for broader ocean policy investment, stronger protection of sea lanes and a more active Japanese role in mine-clearing operations near the Strait of Hormuz.

Chinese and Russian bombers and other military aircraft flew around Japan on June 27, prompting Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi to describe the joint activity as a show of force directed at Japan.

Defense Minister Koizumi met with South Korean Defense Minister Ahn Gyu-back in Seoul on the morning of June 28, with the two ministers agreeing to continue cooperation between Japan and South Korea, as well as among Japan, the United States and South Korea.

Japan’s political agenda on June 26 was dominated by national security, election regulation and Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s push to reshape the country’s long-term economic strategy, as the Diet advanced measures that point to a broader shift in how the government is preparing for defense, technology and political campaigning.

The Takaichi government said on June 24 that public and private investment in 17 strategic fields, including AI and semiconductors, is expected to exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040, as it seeks to draw out private-sector spending and turn advanced technologies into economic growth.

A cross-party national council discussing a reduction in the consumption tax on food will present a draft proposal on June 24 calling for the rate to be lowered to 1% from April next year.

The speakers and vice speakers of both houses of the Japanese Diet approved on June 22 the government’s outline for revising the Imperial Household Law and related measures aimed at securing the number of imperial family members, following what has been described as the consensus of the legislature.